2027 Delivery Classification Guide changes
Ngā panoni Aratohu Whakarōpū Whakapuakanga 2026
Last updated 2 November 2026
Last updated 2 November 2026
This page provides a summary of changes to the Delivery Classification Guide.
This page provides a summary of changes to the Delivery Classification Guide.
General changes
All of document
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| Single Data Return (SDR) reporting |
Added guidance for reporting the correct delivery classification and funding category in the SDR when one course is used across multiple qualifications. |
To clarify requirements for courses used across multiple qualifications. |
All classifications
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| 90 percent subject matter rule |
Updated wording across the classifications to clarify that at least 90 percent of a course’s content or subject matter must relate to the classification being used, unless the programme basis rule applies. |
To remove ambiguity that this rule only applies to postgraduate study. |
| Exclusions and alternative classifications |
Expanded and standardised the “Do not use this classification” guidance, including directions on which classification to use instead. |
To reduce ambiguity and inconsistent classification of courses. |
Changes to individual classifications
#03.1: Osteopathy; Acupuncture
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| Acupuncture |
Added guidance requiring acupuncture training to be accredited under the Chinese Medicine Council (acupuncturist) scope of practice. |
To clarify the requirements for using this classification. |
#11.1: Priority Engineering
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| Description |
Expanded classification description to clarify that this classification can be used where qualifications provide a relevant pathway towards becoming, or further development as, an engineering technician, engineering technologist or professional engineer. |
To clarify the policy intent of this classification. |
#11.2: Pilot Training
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| In-flight training |
Clarified that this classification may be used only for courses leading to qualifications that include an in-flight training component. |
To clarify that courses in qualifications that do not have an in-flight training component cannot use this classification. |
| Approval to use this classification |
Clarified that if a provider is approved for delivery under this classification, any limitations on use of funding will be set out in their funding confirmation letter. |
To accurately describe restrictions on use of this classification. |
#12: Fine Arts; Design
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| Eligible non-degree provision |
Clarified that this classification may only be used for non-degree provision of Fine Arts and Design diplomas at NZQCF Levels 5 and 6. |
To clarify that delivery below Level 5, and non-degree certificates, cannot use this classification. |
#17: Health-Related Professions
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| Eligible programmes |
Clarified that a course must be part of an eligible programme listed in the guide to use this classification. |
To make clear that this classification does not apply broadly to all health-related provision. |
#19.1, #19.2 and #20: Teaching
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| Initial Teacher Education |
Simplified guidance for when Initial Teacher Education qualifications need to be approved by the Teaching Council of Aotearoa New Zealand and lead to teacher registration. |
To make the guidance more concise. |
#23: Veterinary
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| Eligible study |
Clarified that only courses that are part of the Bachelor of Veterinary Science (BVSc), and postgraduate study following the BVSc, can use this classification. |
To remove ambiguity about what veterinary postgraduate study can use this classification. |
| Approval to use this classification |
Clarified that if a provider is approved for delivery under this classification, any limitations on use of funding will be set out in their funding confirmation letter. |
To accurately describe restrictions on use of this classification. |
Definitions
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| Non-prescribed electives |
Removed previous definition of “Elective courses” and added this definition for learner-selected courses that are not part of the required courses for the programme. |
To clarify which elective courses are excluded from the programme basis rule. |
| Required courses |
Added a definition for courses that must be completed to meet programme requirements, including courses selected from a prescribed set. |
To support application of the programme basis rule. |
| Subject category |
Added an explanation of what DQ3-7 subject categories are, and what they are used for. |
To explain the purpose of subject categories. |
Appendix A: The programme basis rule
| Subject |
Change |
Reason |
| Expanded guidance |
Clarified guidance explaining the programme basis rule and how it differs from the 90 percent subject matter rule. |
To make it clearer when the programme basis rule can be applied. |
| Consistency of the programme basis rule |
Clarified that, if the programme basis rule is applied, it must be applied to all required courses in the programme. Otherwise, all courses must be classified under the usual rules. |
To support consistent application of the programme basis rule. |
| Examples |
Added examples for when the programme basis rule can and cannot be applied. |
To illustrate the programme basis rule in practice. |