PBRF 2018 Quality Evaluation

PBRF 2018 Quality Evaluation

Last updated 30 April 2019
Last updated 30 April 2019

This page includes information on the PBRF 2018 Quality Evaluation, including the submission, assessment and auditing processes

What is the Quality Evaluation?

The Quality Evaluation is an assessment of the research performance of staff at participating tertiary education organisations (TEOs) by an expert peer review panel. It is held periodically and is the major component of the Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF).

The Quality Evaluation process is based on the submission and assessment of Evidence Portfolios. Peer review panels assess Evidence Portfolios against agreed standards and this process is moderated by the Principal Moderator and Deputy Moderators.

Participating TEOs are also required to review their staff against the eligibility criteria and participate in our audit processes.

Once the panel decisions have been made and approved, the results are given to each participating TEO and a report on the Quality Evaluation results is published.

2018 Quality Evaluation interim results

Information about the interim results of the PBRF 2018 Quality Evaluation can be found on the PBRF 2018 Quality Evaluation interim results page.

Complaints process for the 2018 Quality Evaluation

The PBRF Quality Evaluation complaints process ensures that if there has been a failing of due process this can be rectified appropriately.

The TEC will only accept and investigate complaints from tertiary education organisations (TEOs) that concern possible administrative or procedural errors.

Making a complaint about administrative or procedural errors

All complaints must be submitted:

  • by the staff member’s employing TEO (any complaint received from individual staff members will be referred to the relevant TEO)
  • on the TEC’s Complaint Form – PBRF 2018 Quality Evaluation  (PDF, 191 Kb)
  • within 35 working days of the TEO being notified of the PBRF 2018 Quality Evaluation results.

For information on how we process complaints, possible outcomes and costs see:



Requesting your individual results

Individual researchers may request information on the assessment of their own Evidence Portfolio from the 2018 Quality Evaluation.

To request this information, you will need to complete a Request for Evidence Portfolio Information form (PDF, 197 Kb).

Important: This is a writable PDF form. Please ensure you download and save the form, complete it, then save again before emailing it to sectorhelpdesk@tec.govt.nz.

You can now choose to have your results emailed to you rather than posted, and we encourage you to select this option for speed and efficiency.

To ensure confidentiality, if we have any concerns related to your identity, the information will not be released.

TEOs cannot request this information on behalf of staff.

Guidelines for the 2018 Quality Evaluation

The TEC and the Sector Reference Group (SRG) developed operational guidelines for the 2018 Quality Evaluation. These guidelines incorporated the valuable feedback provided by the sector and other stakeholders as a part of the SRG consultation process.

Refer to the PBRF Resources and publications page to view operational guidelines.

 

Audit reports

The PBRF 2018 Quality Evaluation has been supported by a comprehensive compliance audit programme. The objective of the audit programme has been to provide assurance to the TEC that the guidelines for the 2018 Quality Evaluation were consistently and correctly applied by all participating tertiary education organisations. The audit process had two phases: Process assurance and Data evaluation.

KPMG was appointed as the auditor for the 2018 Quality Evaluation following a competitive procurement process. 

Reports: