Educational performance at individual tertiary providers
We publish information on the performance of tertiary education organisations (TEOs) based on agreed educational performance indicators (EPIs).
Our EPI reports are designed to help TEOs manage and monitor their own performance and to deliver on their agreed tertiary education services.
The information in the EPI reports provides a snapshot of selected performance indicators and does not give a comprehensive picture of a TEO's overall performance.
What funds are reported on
The information published here is based only on tertiary education funded by:
Note that the effects of the Canterbury earthquakes may have had an impact on student performance for Canterbury-based TEOs.
More details about what each of the indicators show are also available.
New EPI reports
After consultation with the sector, we developed new methodologies to calculate two of the EPIs and have produced a set of new EPI reports for individual TEOs.
New EPI reports using cohort-based qualification completion and first-year retention rates
Viewing the reports
Use the dropdown boxes below to look up the EPI reports for each TEO by name, year or subsector.
2014 educational performance for individual tertiary providers
The two Excel reports below provide a summary of 2014 performance information for SAC and Youth Guarantee for individual tertiary providers, broken down by:
2014 SAC EPI summary by individual tertiary provider (XLS, 120 Kb)
- grouped qualification register level
- Tertiary Education Strategy priority groups of Māori and Pasifika students
- students under 25.
2014 YG EPI summary by individual tertiary provider (XLS, 64 Kb)
Where to go for additional informationNew Zealand Qualifications Authority and the Academic Quality Agency for New Zealand Universities (AQA) undertake external reviews of the quality of tertiary providers and publish review reports on their websites.
Note about EFTS
Where an organisation is funded for fewer than five Equivalent Full Time Students (EFTS), there is no individual data available for them. This is to ensure individual students cannot be identified.
Where an organisation has fewer than 30 EFTS at a level of study, no information will be available for that level of study. This is to ensure statistically robust sample sizes that allow for comparison.